Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

PRINT DIGITAL

Since fat skis have more surface area than regular skis, are they faster?

Since fat skis have more surface area than regular skis, are they faster?

Gear
posted: 11/28/2005



Even though a fat ski may have greater weight-distributing surface-area measurements, the skinny ski still wins in a glide race because there's less resistance perpendicular to the direction of travel. More simply: The fatty creates more drag. That's true only on hard snow, though. In soft snow, all that width lets fat skis float more easily through powder and crud so you can open up the throttle a bit. That same soft snow will swallow (and thus slow) a narrower ski. So why can fat skis feel like Speedy Gonzalez underfoot? Their relatively shallow sidecuts are straighter than those found on hard-snow skis, which insist on turning all the time. Remember: "Turning" is just another term for "braking." Fat skis, like old-school GS boards, barely bother with sidecut, and thus sprint downhill.

November 2005

reviews of Since fat skis have more surface area than regular skis, are they faster?
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use